Why do the Union territories of Puducherry and Delhi have their own assembly?
Delhi and Puducherry enjoy a unique position. They differ from traditional states and Union Territories in several ways. These two UTs have a Legislative Assembly, a Chief Minister, and a Lt. Governor instead of the administrators found in other UTs. Delhi cannot be awarded the status of a whole state because it is the capital and hosts all of the embassy offices and other significant institutions. If it were given such a special status, a separate government would be required for Lutyens Delhi.
Delhi was given the designation of being unique, and a Chief Minister and Legislative Assembly were established; however, they don't actually have a lot of power. It is not comparable to the relationship between a governor and CM in other states. Unlike other states, Delhi's Lt. Governor is not required to consult the city's council of ministers.
With the exception of items 1, 2, and 18 on the State List, the Legislative Assembly has the authority to pass laws under Article 239AA. The Lt. Governor, however, has the authority to make any decision on behalf of the state, even ones that fall outside the scope of these things.
Following independence, Delhi had a legislative assembly until 1956. The State Reorganisation Committee suggested in 1956 that Delhi be eliminated as a state, and Delhi remained under central government jurisdiction up until 1993.
The need for state assembly and legislative authority persisted. As a result, on December 24, 1987, the Government of India appointed the Sarkaria Committee to investigate the many problems relating to the administration of Delhi's union territory and to make recommendations for actions to streamline the administrative structure. Delhi also gained a legislative assembly and became a UT.
Delhi's legislative assembly persisted after it gained independence until 1956. Delhi remained under the control of the central government until 1993, despite the State Reorganisation Committee's 1956 recommendation that it be abolished as a state.
There was still a need for a state legislature and assembly. As a result, on December 24, 1987, the Government of India created the Sarkaria Committee to look into the many issues connected to the administration of Delhi's union territory and to give suggestions for steps to streamline the administrative system. In addition, Delhi got a legislative assembly and became a UT.
In contrast to other states where municipalities exist solely for symbolic purposes, all other states ought to have municipalities with direct authority over civic matters. Here, the Lt. Governor, not the CM, is directly accountable to the municipality. This topic is still being debated, and four committees have previously worked on it. The basic concerns must be handled by a body under the control of the central government, all committees agree. Because it is the capital, Delhi should ideally fall under the control of the central government.
